Home / Journal Club

Journal Club

Evidence-based reviews and discussion of influential scientific literature.

A structured, repeatable way of reading a paper — so the discussion focuses on what the evidence actually supports, not just what the abstract claims.

Format

How a review is structured

Every journal club entry follows the same five-part structure, so reviews stay comparable across papers and specialties.

1

The question

What clinical or scientific question the study set out to answer, and why it matters in practice.

Format
2

Methods at a glance

Design, population, sample size, and outcome measures — the details that determine how much the result can be trusted.

Format
3

Key results

The headline findings, reported plainly, with effect sizes and confidence intervals kept in view.

Format
4

Critical appraisal

Strengths, limitations, sources of bias, and how the findings hold up against prior evidence.

Format
5

Clinical takeaway

What, if anything, should change in practice — and what would need to be true for that to hold.

Format

Coverage

Where reviews will start

Cardiology & Critical Care

Trials and guidelines shaping acute and cardiovascular care.

General & Internal Medicine

Papers relevant to everyday ward and outpatient decisions.

Public Health & NCDs

Research on non-communicable disease burden, prevention, and health systems.

The first reviews are in progress.

Subscribe to be the first to receive each new journal club entry as it's published.

Get notified

Join the newsletter

Weekly insights on physiology, research, and evidence-based practice.

One email a week. No noise — just what's worth reading before your next ward round or lab meeting.

Subscribe on Kit →

Opens in a new tab · no spam, unsubscribe anytime.